Influence of Silane Coupling Agents on Filler Network Structure and Stress-Induced Particle Rearrangement in Elastomer Nanocomposites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Filled rubber materials are key in many technologies having a broad impact on the economy and sustainability, the most obvious being tire technology. Adding filler dramatically improves the strength of rubber by reinforcement and tailoring the type of filler, and the chemistry of the interface between the filler and rubber matrix is important for optimizing performance metrics such as fuel efficiency. In a highly loaded, silica-filled, cross-linked model rubber closely mimicking commercial materials, both the filler network structure and the dynamics of the silica filler particles change when the silica surface is modified with silane coupling agents. Reduction in size scales characteristic of the structure is quantified using ultra-small-angle X-ray scattering (USAXS) measurements and the particle dynamics probed with X-ray photon correlation spectroscopy (XPCS). While the structure averaged over the scattering volume changes little with aging after step strain, the dynamics slow appreciably in a manner that varies with the treatment of the silica filler. The evolution of filler particle dynamics depends on the chemical functionality at the silica surface, and observing these differences suggests a way of thinking about the origins of hysteresis in nanoparticle-reinforced rubbers. These microscopic filler dynamics are correlated with the macroscopic stress relaxation of the filled materials. The combination of static and dynamic X-ray scattering techniques with rheological measurements is a powerful approach for elucidating the microscopic mechanisms of rubber reinforcement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".