MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3087053157 · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c03453

CO<sub>2</sub> Electroreduction to Methane at Production Rates Exceeding 100 mA/cm<sup>2</sup>

2020· article· en· W3087053157 on OpenAlexafffund
Armin Sedighian Rasouli, Xue Wang, Joshua Wicks, Geonhui Lee, Tao Peng, Fengwang Li, Christopher McCallum, Cao‐Thang Dinh, Alexander H. Ip, David Sinton, Edward H. Sargent

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Resources CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMethaneSelectivityCatalysisElectrolyteCurrent densityRenewable energyElectrochemistryChemistryVolumetric flow rateInorganic chemistryCathodic protectionAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceChemical engineeringElectrodeEnvironmental chemistryPhysical chemistryThermodynamicsPhysicsOrganic chemistryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electrochemical reduction of CO 2 to methane is a promising method to store intermittent renewable energy. Previous research reporting high methane selectivity has relied on H-cells, and total current densities have therefore resided below 50 mA/cm 2, insufficient for industrial applications. Here, we increase the methane production rate by modifying the system so that it functions efficiently in a flow cell configuration. We investigate the impact of the local environment on methane selectivity in flow cells by tuning the choice of electrolyte cation, catalyst thickness, and local pH. We achieve a methane selectivity of 48% ± 4% with a partial current density of 120 ± 10 mA/cm 2, representing a cathodic energy efficiency of 23%. We showcase a stable operation for 14 h.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Sustainable Chemistry & EngineeringSame topicCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsFrench-language works237,207