MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3087059466 · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2021.103635

CVPR 2020 continual learning in computer vision competition: Approaches, results, current challenges and future directions

2021· preprint· en· W3087059466 on OpenAlexaff
Vincenzo Lomonaco, Lorenzo Pellegrini, Pau Rodríguez, M. Caccia, Qi She, Yu Chen, Quentin Jodelet, Ruiping Wang, Zheda Mai, David Vázquez, German I. Parisi, Nikhil Churamani, Marc Pickett, Issam Laradji, Davide Maltoni

Bibliographic record

VenueArtificial Intelligence · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBenchmarkingComputer scienceForgettingArtificial intelligenceBenchmark (surveying)Task (project management)Field (mathematics)Machine learningDeep learningSet (abstract data type)Competition (biology)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0090.007
Research integrity0.0070.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueArtificial IntelligenceSame topicDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningFrench-language works237,207