MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3087074149

Overlapping Roles of Iroquois Homeobox Genes 3 and 4 in the Compaction of the Ventricular Myocardium

2017· dissertation· en· W3087074149 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Wei Fan Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHospital for Sick Children
KeywordsHomeoboxBiologyGeneHeart developmentCell biologyGeneticsAnatomyTranscription factorEmbryonic stem cell
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) is a primary congenital cardiomyopathy characterized by prominent trabeculation and intra-trabecular recesses in the ventricular wall. Its genetic basis and pathologic mechanism remain largely unknown. Here it is shown that Irx3;Irx4 double knockout (DKO) mouse mutants represent a novel model of LVNC. Irx3 and Irx4 belong to the family of Iroquois homeobox (Irx) genes, encoding transcription factors important for cardiac function. Mice lacking either Irx3 or Irx4 do not have gross cardiac malformations. In contrast, Irx3;Irx4DKO mice exhibit postnatal lethality and thinner ventricular walls as early as E14.5. By P14, DKO mice have prominent noncompacted trabeculation and abnormal muscular growth that resemble human LVNC. Furthermore, Irx3;Irx4DKO hearts exhibit increased expression of heart failure marker genes, elevated Bmp10 pathway activity, and altered pattern of cardiomyocyte proliferation, each of which are implicated in the pathogenesis of LVNC. Taken together, these studies suggest that Irx3 and Irx4 possess overlapping functions, which are essential to myocardial compaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicCardiomyopathy and Myosin StudiesFrench-language works237,207