MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3087099660 · doi:10.1080/15265161.2020.1806400

Ethical Convergence and Ethical Possibilities: The Implications of New Materialism for Understanding the Molecular Turn in HIV, the Response to COVID-19, and the Future of Bioethics

2020· letter· en· W3087099660 on OpenAlexaffabout
Adrian Guţă, Marilou Gagnon, Morgan M. Philbin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Bioethics · 2020
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEthics in Clinical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWindsorBioethicsMaterialismCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)SociologyFlourishingThe artsResearch ethicsHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Political scienceSocial scienceMedicinePsychologySocial psychologyLawEpistemologyPsychiatryPhilosophyVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image sizeThis article refers to:Reassessing the Ethics of Molecular HIV Surveillance in the Era of Cluster Detection and Response: Toward HIV Data Justice ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSAdrian Guta is a University of Windsor, Faculty of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences, Humanities Research Group Fellow.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Social Science and Humanities Research Council. Morgan M. Philbin was supported by a US National Institute on Drug Abuse funded grant (K01DA039804A).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.047
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.081
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.254
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0470.081
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.036
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.034
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.384
GPT teacher head0.537
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of BioethicsSame topicEthics in Clinical ResearchFrench-language works237,207