Broad Efficacy of Cariprazine on Depressive Symptoms in Bipolar Disorder and the Clinical Implications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Bipolar disorder is a complex mood disorder characterized by a chronic and subtle course of fluctuating manic/hypomanic and depressive symptoms. Cariprazine, a dopamine D₃-preferring D₃/D₂ receptor partial agonist with serotonin 5-HT1A receptor partial agonist and serotonin 5-HT2A antagonist properties, is approved to treat manic and depressive episodes of bipolar disorder. Post hoc analyses evaluated efficacy across symptoms in bipolar depression. METHODS: Pooled data were analyzed from 3 phase 2 or 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of adults with bipolar disorder and a major depressive episode. Mean change from baseline to week 6 in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score and individual item scores were analyzed in individual dose groups (1.5 mg/d, 3 mg/d) and overall cariprazine (1.5-3 mg/d). Pooled safety was evaluated via adverse events. RESULTS: A significantly greater difference in mean change from baseline in MADRS total score was seen for each cariprazine dose group versus placebo (least squares mean difference vs placebo: 1.5-3 mg/d = -2.6, 1.5 mg/d = -2.8, 3 mg/d = -2.4) (P < .001 all). Significant differences versus placebo were seen on all individual MADRS items except inner tension for the overall cariprazine group (P < .05). Cariprazine was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Cariprazine demonstrated broad efficacy across symptoms of depression in bipolar disorder. In previous post hoc analyses, cariprazine also demonstrated broad efficacy across manic symptoms, suggesting that it is effective across the wide range of symptoms on the bipolar spectrum. A 1.5-mg/d starting dose and slow titration resulted in lower rates of some adverse events in the bipolar depression studies versus the mania studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01396447, NCT02670538, NCT02670551.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".