Spatiotemporal Gait Measurement With a Side-View Depth Sensor Using Human Joint Proposals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a method for calculating standard spatiotemporal gait parameters from individual human joints with a side-view depth sensor. Clinical walking trials were measured concurrently by a side-view Kinect and a pressure-sensitive walkway, the Zeno Walkway. Multiple joint proposals were generated from depth images by a stochastic predictor based on the Kinect algorithm. The proposals are represented as vertices in a weighted graph, where the weights depend on the expected and measured lengths between body parts. A shortest path through the graph is a set of joints from head to foot. Accurate foot positions are selected by comparing pairs of shortest paths. Stance phases of the feet are detected by examining the motion of the feet over time. The stance phases are used to calculate four gait parameters: stride length, step length, stride width, and stance percentage. A constant frame rate was assumed for the calculation of stance percentage because time stamps were not captured during the experiment. Gait parameters from 52 trials were compared to the ground truth walkway using Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficients. The large spatial parameters had the strongest agreements with the walkway (ICC(2, 1) = 1.00 and 0.98 for stride and step length with normal pace, respectively). The presented system directly calculates gait parameters from individual foot positions while previous side-view systems relied on indirect measures. Using a side-view system allows for tracking walking in both directions with one camera, extending the range in which the subject is in the field of view.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".