MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3087329381

Structural Exposure of Steel Frame in Large Fire Incident

2015· article· en· W3087329381 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter Senez, Keith Calder, Adrian Milford, Andrew Coles

Bibliographic record

VenueResponse of Structures Under Extreme Loading (PROTECT 2015) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFire effects on concrete materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCladding (metalworking)Ceiling (cloud)Environmental scienceSteel frameCoatingForensic engineeringMaterials scienceEngineeringComposite materialStructural engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reviews a large fire loss that occurred at a seasonally operated Canadian food-processing facility. The structure had been constructed over a 10 year period under different permits and contracts, with an exposed steel structural frame and metal cladding. The interior wall and ceiling surfaces were finished with a metal building insulation (MBI) product that incorporated a polypropylene moisture barrier. The fire occurred when the facility was not in production, resulting in limited fuel load that was confined to localized areas of the facility. The fire developed from a rack storage area that was remote from other fuel packages within the facility, and spread to adjacent areas of the building as a consequence of the polypropylene coating on the MBI. The building partially collapsed many hours after the fire started. The fire origin and cause investigation included the use of metallurgical and hardness testing of the structural steel in conjunction with computer simulations to predict the thermal exposure and fire behavior throughout the collapsed structure

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResponse of Structures Under Extreme Loading (PROTECT 2015)Same topicFire effects on concrete materialsFrench-language works237,207