MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3087424167 · doi:10.1002/jcsm.12623

<i>lncMGPF</i> is a novel positive regulator of muscle growth and regeneration

2020· article· en· W3087424167 on OpenAlexaff
Wei Lv, Jianjun Jin, Zaiyan Xu, Hongmei Luo, Yubo Guo, Xiaojing Wang, Shanshan Wang, Jiali Zhang, Hao Zuo, Wei Bai, Jun‐Ming Tang, Shuhong Zhao, Bo Zuo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMyoDMyogenesisMyogeninC2C12Skeletal muscleMyocyteBiologyCell biologyMyoD ProteinMyogenic regulatory factorsMolecular biologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) play critical regulatory roles in diverse biological processes and diseases. While a large number of lncRNAs have been identified in skeletal muscles until now, their function and underlying mechanisms in skeletal myogenesis remain largely unclear. METHODS: We characterized a novel functional lncRNA designated lncMGPF (lncRNA muscle growth promoting factor) using RACE, Northern blot, fluorescence in situ hybridization and quantitative real-time PCR. Its function was determined by gene overexpression, interference, and knockout experiments in C2C12 myoblasts, myogenic progenitor cells, and an animal model. The molecular mechanism by which lncMGPF regulates muscle differentiation was mainly examined by cotransfection experiments, luciferase reporter assay, RNA immunoprecipitation, RNA pull-down, and RNA stability analyses. RESULTS: We report that lncMGPF, which is highly expressed in muscles and positively regulated by myoblast determination factor (MyoD), promotes myogenic differentiation of muscle cells in vivo and in vitro. lncMGPF knockout in mice substantially decreases growth rate, reduces muscle mass, and impairs muscle regeneration. Overexpression of lncMGPF in muscles can rescue the muscle phenotype of knockout mice and promote muscle growth of wild-type mice. Mechanistically, lncMGPF promotes muscle differentiation by acting as a molecular sponge of miR-135a-5p and thus increasing the expression of myocyte enhancer factor 2C (MEF2C), as well as by enhancing human antigen R-mediated messenger RNA stabilization of myogenic regulatory genes such as MyoD and myogenin (MyoG). We confirm that pig lncRNA AK394747 and human lncRNA MT510647 are homologous to mouse lncMGPF, with conserved function and mechanism during myogenesis. CONCLUSIONS: Our data reveal that lncMGPF is a novel positive regulator of myogenic differentiation, muscle growth and regeneration in mice, pigs, and humans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and MuscleSame topicCancer-related molecular mechanisms researchFrench-language works237,207