MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3087532723 · doi:10.1002/app.49899

Synthesis and characterization of natural rubber‐based telechelic oligomers via olefin metathesis

2020· article· en· W3087532723 on OpenAlexaff
Guangwei Hu, Shaohui Lin, Boxin Zhao, Qinmin Pan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Polymer Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersPriority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education InstitutionsNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTelechelic polymerPolymer chemistryDispersityOligomerCatalysisPolymerMetathesisChemistryNatural rubberChain transferCopolymerAcyclic diene metathesisGrubbs' catalystEnd-groupMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryPolymerizationRadical polymerization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Metathesis degradation and functionalization of natural rubber (NR) were conducted with 1‐hexene, 1‐octene, 1‐decene, 1‐dodecene, trans ‐stilbene, and 4,4′‐dibromo‐ trans ‐stilbene as chain transfer agents (CTAs) in presence of Grubbs 2nd generation catalyst to generate NR‐based telechelic oligomers that had been a long‐lasting challenge due to the structure and compositions of NR with various impurities. Orthogonal experiments were applied and the effects of the CTA type, CTA concentration, catalyst concentration, reaction time, and reaction temperature on the formation of telechelic oligomers were studied, indicating that the catalyst concentration was the major factor influencing the number average molecular weights ( M n ) and polymer dispersity index (PDI) of telechelic oligomers. The structures of the oligomers were characterized using 1 H NMR, 13 C NMR, and MALDI‐TOF‐MS, which confirmed the formation of the designed terminal groups. The results showed that well‐defined telechelic oligomers with a M n of a few thousand and a PDI around 1.6 were obtained, with potential applications in binder, lubricant and many other fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.614

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Polymer ScienceSame topicSynthetic Organic Chemistry MethodsFrench-language works237,207