Strong Arms and Idle Minds : Canadian Laborers and Masculine Imagery in the Rhetoric Strategies of Frontier College Reformists in the 1920s
Bibliographic record
Abstract
My master’s thesis focuses on the masculine language and rhetoric used by Ca-nadian social reformists Alfred Fitzpatrick and Edmund Bradwin, who operated an adult education organization named Frontier College in the early 20th century. Frontier College’s main agenda revolved around rural industry spaces such as lumber camps, mining towns and railway construction sites, which had in the turn of the century grown to employ an unprecedented number of transient workers from diverse backgrounds, and were largely defined by poor and unreg-ulated housing conditions. The frontier laborers, as men in their physical prime haunted by idleness of the mind, caused great anxiety in the public imagination. Fitzpatrick and Bradwin believed that intervention in form of technical, cultural and moral education and housing reforms would work toward wholesome assimi-lation and canadianization of frontier laborers. \nMy primary sources consist of two publications, Fitzpatrick’s University in Over-alls (1920) and Bradwin’s The Bunkhouse Man (1922), and my research ques-tions center around the ways masculinity and manhood were employed in both texts as rhetorical strategies to impact both the workers and the educated mid-dle-class audience. I discuss the themes, repetitions and implications found in the texts using the method of qualitative close reading and by contextualizing them in the contemporary ideals of physical, independent and assertive mascu-line performance. The theoretical framework of this thesis stems from feminist gender theory, performativity of gender and the concept of multiple masculinities. \nThe analysis carried throughout the thesis shows that the reformers’ apparent fixation on the workers’ masculine performance was most apparent in their lan-guage of exaggeration and emasculation, which worked as a tool of empower-ment and inspiration for both the laborers as well as the middle-classes who re-flected their masculinity on the imagery of idealized frontier manhood. Additional-ly, the reason why manhood arose into such a prominent position in the rhetoric likely stemmed from the societal anxieties over immigration, ethnic and racial diversity and non-conforming sexual and social behavior in relation to the middle-class Upper Canadian and British cultural values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".