MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3087612136 · doi:10.1002/ijc.33339

Weight change in middle adulthood and risk of cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (<scp>EPIC</scp>) cohort

2020· article· en· W3087612136 on OpenAlex
Sofia Christakoudi, Panagiota Pagoni, Pietro Ferrari, Amanda J. Cross, Ioanna Tzoulaki, David C. Muller, Elisabete Weiderpass, Heinz Freisling, Neil Murphy, Laure Dossus, Renée T. Fortner, Antonio Agudo, Kim Overvad, Aurora Perez‐Cornago, Timothy J. Key, Paul Brennan, Mattias Johansson, Anne Tjønneland, Jytte Halkjær, Marie‐Christine Boutron‐Ruault, Fanny Artaud, Gianluca Severi, Rudolf Kaaks, Matthias B. Schulze, Manuela M. Bergmann, Giovanna Masala, Sara Grioni, Vittorio Simeon, ­Rosario ­Tumino, Carlotta Sacerdote, Guri Skeie, Charlotta Rylander, Kristin Benjaminsen Borch, J. Ramón Quirós, Miguel Rodríguez‐Barranco, María‐Dolores Chirlaque, Eva Ardanáz, Pilar Amiano, Isabel Drake, Tanja Stocks, Christel Häggström, Sophia Harlid, Merete Ellingjord‐Dale, Elio Ríboli, Konstantinos K. Tsilidis

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Cancer · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Risks and Factors
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIRijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en MilieuWorld Cancer Research FundDirectorate-General for Health and ConsumersMedical Research Council CanadaMedical Research CouncilInstitut Gustave-RoussyDeutsche KrebshilfeVetenskapsrådetCancer Research UKWorld Health OrganizationEuropean CommissionCancerfondenMutuelle Générale de l'Education NationaleAssociazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul CancroImperial College LondonDeutsches KrebsforschungszentrumLigue Contre le CancerBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleKræftens BekæmpelseNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research CentreCentre International de Recherche sur le Cancer
KeywordsMedicineEuropean Prospective Investigation into Cancer and NutritionWeight gainHazard ratioWeight changeProspective cohort studyBody mass indexCancerOverweightCohortInternal medicineBreast cancerCohort studyProportional hazards modelRisk factorObesityConfidence intervalGynecologyWeight lossBody weight

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Obesity is a risk factor for several major cancers. Associations of weight change in middle adulthood with cancer risk, however, are less clear. We examined the association of change in weight and body mass index (BMI) category during middle adulthood with 42 cancers, using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort. Of 241 323 participants (31% men), 20% lost and 32% gained weight (>0.4 to 5.0 kg/year) during 6.9 years (average). During 8.0 years of follow-up after the second weight assessment, 20 960 incident cancers were ascertained. Independent of baseline BMI, weight gain (per one kg/year increment) was positively associated with cancer of the corpus uteri (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.14; 95% confidence interval: 1.05-1.23). Compared to stable weight (±0.4 kg/year), weight gain (>0.4 to 5.0 kg/year) was positively associated with cancers of the gallbladder and bile ducts (HR = 1.41; 1.01-1.96), postmenopausal breast (HR = 1.08; 1.00-1.16) and thyroid (HR = 1.40; 1.04-1.90). Compared to maintaining normal weight, maintaining overweight or obese BMI (World Health Organisation categories) was positively associated with most obesity-related cancers. Compared to maintaining the baseline BMI category, weight gain to a higher BMI category was positively associated with cancers of the postmenopausal breast (HR = 1.19; 1.06-1.33), ovary (HR = 1.40; 1.04-1.91), corpus uteri (HR = 1.42; 1.06-1.91), kidney (HR = 1.80; 1.20-2.68) and pancreas in men (HR = 1.81; 1.11-2.95). Losing weight to a lower BMI category, however, was inversely associated with cancers of the corpus uteri (HR = 0.40; 0.23-0.69) and colon (HR = 0.69; 0.52-0.92). Our findings support avoiding weight gain and encouraging weight loss in middle adulthood.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it