MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The anodic formation of sulfide and oxide films on copper in borate-buffered aqueous chloride solutions containing sulfide

2020· article· en· W3087642746 on OpenAlexafffund
Mengnan Guo, Jian Chen, Christina Lilja, Vahid Dehnavi, Mehran Behazin, James J. Noël, David W. Shoesmith

Bibliographic record

VenueElectrochimica Acta · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCorrosion Behavior and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsNuclear Waste Management OrganizationWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSvensk KärnbränslehanteringNuclear Waste Management Organization
KeywordsSulfideChalcociteDissolutionInorganic chemistryOxidePassivationChemistryAqueous solutionCopper sulfideCopperChlorideRaman spectroscopyChalcopyritePhysical chemistryLayer (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The formation of sulfide and oxide films on copper has been studied in sulfide solutions containing chloride and buffered to pH = 9 with borate over the temperature range 20 °C to 80 °C. The primary goal was to investigate the susceptibility of copper to pitting corrosion over a range of temperatures expected in a deep geological repository. Films were formed electrochemically and characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray and Raman spectroscopy and X-ray diffractometry (XRD). Chalcocite (Cu2S) formation was observed to occur under partially transport-controlled conditions in the potential range −0.9 V to −0.3 V vs SCE. At less negative potentials (≥ −0.3 V vs SCE), a transition from active dissolution to partial passivation by a copper oxide film was observed. Temperature had only a minor effect on the formation of the sulfide film, but the onset of active dissolution and oxide film formation shifted to lower potentials as the temperature increased.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.459

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectrochimica ActaSame topicCorrosion Behavior and InhibitionFrench-language works237,207