Improved recovery guarantees and sampling strategies for TV minimization in compressive imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we consider the use of Total Variation (TV) minimization for compressive imaging; that is, image reconstruction from subsampled measurements. Focusing on two important imaging modalities -- namely, Fourier imaging and structured binary imaging via the Walsh--Hadamard transform -- we derive uniform recovery guarantees asserting stable and robust recovery for arbitrary random sampling strategies. Using this, we then derive a class of theoretically-optimal sampling strategies. For Fourier sampling, we show recovery of an image with approximately $s$-sparse gradient from $m \gtrsim_d s \cdot \log^2(s) \cdot \log^4(N)$ measurements, in $d \geq 1$ dimensions. When $d = 2$, this improves the current state-of-the-art result by a factor of $\log(s) \cdot \log(N)$. It also extends it to arbitrary dimensions $d \geq 2$. For Walsh sampling, we prove that $m \gtrsim_d s \cdot \log^2(s) \cdot \log^2(N/s) \cdot \log^3(N) $ measurements suffice in $d \geq 2$ dimensions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first recovery guarantee for structured binary sampling with TV minimization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".