Petrography and Geochemistry of the Carboniferous Ortokarnash Manganese Deposit in the Western Kunlun Mountains, Xinjiang Province, China: Implications for the Depositional Environment and the Origin of Mineralization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Upper Carboniferous Ortokarnash manganese ore deposit in the West Kunlun orogenic belt of the Xinjiang province in China is hosted in the Kalaatehe Formation. The latter is composed of three members: (1) the 1st Member is a volcanic breccia limestone, (2) the 2nd Member is a sandy limestone, and (3) the 3rd Member is a dark gray to black marlstone containing the manganese carbonate mineralization, which, in turn, is overlain by sandy and micritic limestone. This sequence represents a single transgression-regression cycle, with the manganese deposition occurring during the highstand systems tract. Geochemical features of the rare earth elements (REE+Y) in the Kalaatehe Formation suggest that both the manganese ore and associated rocks were generally deposited under an oxic water column with Post-Archean Australian Shale (PAAS)-normalized REE+Y patterns displaying characteristics of modern seawater (e.g., light REE depletion and negative Ce anomalies). The manganese ore is dominated by fine-grained rhodochrosite (MnCO3), dispersed in Mn-rich silicates (e.g., friedelite and chlorite), and trace quantities of alabandite (MnS) and pyrolusite (MnO2). The replacement of pyrolusite by rhodochrosite suggests that the initial manganese precipitates were Mn(IV)-oxides. Precipitation within an oxic water column is supported by shale-normalized REE+Y patterns from the carbonate ores that are characterized by large positive Ce (>3.0) anomalies, negative Y (~0.7) anomalies, low Y/Ho ratios (~20), and a lack of fractionation between the light and heavy rare earth elements ((Nd/Yb)PAAS ~0.9). The manganese carbonate ores are also 13C-depleted, further suggesting that the Mn(II) carbonates formed as a result of Mn(III/IV)-oxide reduction during burial diagenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".