Ex vivo cardiovascular magnetic resonance diffusion weighted imaging in congenital heart disease, an insight into the microstructures of tetralogy of Fallot, biventricular and univentricular systemic right ventricle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Common types of congenital heart disease exhibit a variety of structural and functional variations which may be accompanied by changes in the myocardial microstructure. We aimed to compare myocardial architecture from magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in preserved pathology specimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pathology specimens (n = 24) formalin-fixed for 40.8 ± 7.9 years comprised tetralogy of Fallot (TOF, n = 10), dextro-transposition of great arteries (D-TGA, n = 8) five with ventricular septal defect (VSD), systemic right ventricle (n = 4), situs inversus totalis (SIT, n = 1) and levo-TGA (L-TGA, n = 1). Specimens were imaged using a custom spin-echo sequence and segmented automatically according to tissue volume fraction. In each specimen T1, T2, fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, helix angle (HA) and sheet angle (E2A) were quantified. Pathologies were compared according to their HA gradient, HA asymmetry and E2A mean value in each myocardial segment (anterior, posterior, septal and lateral walls). RESULTS: TOF and D-TGA with VSD had decreased helix angle gradient by - 0.34°/% and remained symmetric in the septum in comparison to D-TGA without VSD. Helix angle range was decreased by 45°. It was associated with a decreased HA gradient in the right ventricular (RV) wall, i.e. predominant circumferential myocytes. The sheet angle in the septum of TOF was opposing those of the left ventricular (LV) free wall. Univentricular systemic RV had the lowest HA gradient (- 0.43°/%) and the highest HA asymmetry (75%). HA in SIT was linear, asymmetric, and reversed with a sign change at about 70% of the depth at mid-ventricle. In L-TGA with VSD, HA was asymmetric (90%) and its gradients were decreased in the septum, anterior and lateral wall. CONCLUSION: The organization of the myocytes as determined by DTI differs between TOF, D-TGA, L-TGA, systemic RV and SIT specimens. These differences in cardiac structure may further enlighten our understanding of cardiac function in these diverse congenital heart diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".