MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

First direct monitoring and time-lapse mapping starts to reveal how a large submarine fan works

2020· article· en· W3087746226 on OpenAlexaffabout
Peter J. Talling, Ricardo de Silva Jacinto, Megan Baker, Ed Pope, Maarten Heijnen, Sophie Hage, Catharina Heerema, Stephen M. Simmons, Claire McGhee, Sean Ruffell, Martin Hasenhündl, Ronan Apprioual, Anthony Ferrant, Morelia Urlaub, Matthieu Cartigny, Michael Clare, Daniel R. Parsons, Bernard Dennielou, Arnaud Gaillot, C. Peirce

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCanyonTurbidity currentSubmarine canyonGeologySeabedSubmarine pipelineOceanographyCoringSubmarineBathymetrySedimentChannel (broadcasting)Internal tideHydrology (agriculture)GeomorphologyDrillingInternal waveStructural basinSedimentary depositional environmentGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Turbidity currents form many of the largest sediment accumulations, longest channels, and deepest canyons on our planet. These seabed sediment avalanches can be very (> 10 m/s) fast, runout for hundreds of kilometres, and break seabed cables that now form the backbone of the internet and global data transfer. It was once thought that detailed monitoring of turbidity currents in action was impractical, ensuring these flows were relatively poorly understood. However, a series of recent projects have used new approaches and technology to show how these flows can be measured in shallow water (< 2 km) settings, such as Monterey Canyon and Canadian fjords, where flows ran out for < ~50 km and had speeds of up to 8 m/s. Here we present initial results from an ambitious project to measure active flows that runout for >1,000 km to form a major submarine fan in the deep ocean. The project studies the Congo submarine canyon-channel system that extends for ~1,100 km from the mouth of the Congo River, offshore West Africa. Monitoring in 2010 at a single site in the upper Congo Canyon had previously shown that flows are active for ~30% of the time, and reach speeds of up to 3 m/s. In this new project, direct flow monitoring at 11 sites are being combined with detailed time-lapse mapping and coring of flow deposits, through a series of 4 or 5 major research cruises from 2019 to 2023. Here we present initial results from the first of these cruises (JC187) in August-to-October 2019, which placed 11 moorings with sensors at water depths of 1.6 to 5.5 km. The presentation will initially focus on the geomorphology of the channel system, and how it varies down-slope and through time. For example, it is apparent that a landslide partly blocked one location in the upper canyon in the last 20 years, causing meander bend cut-off and sediment ponding. The talk will then discuss models for how submarine channel bends evolve, and the implications for channel deposits. Recent work in sandy submarine channels suggests that they can be dominated by very fast-moving knickpoints (waterfall like features). However, the much muddier Congo channel displays well-developed meander bend bars for which cores are available. We therefore start to show how muddy deep-sea channels may differ in significant ways from their sandier cousins in shallow water.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207