MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3087775605 · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2020.04.044

A Genetic Algorithm-Based Model for Product Platform Design for Hybrid Manufacturing

2020· article· en· W3087775605 on OpenAlexaff
Mostafa Moussa, Hoda ElMaraghy

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia CIRP · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicProduct Development and Customization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVariety (cybernetics)Product proliferationProduct (mathematics)Genetic algorithmOrder (exchange)Manufacturing engineeringBuild to orderProduct designComputer scienceEngineeringNew product developmentIndustrial engineeringMathematicsArtificial intelligenceProduction (economics)Product managementMachine learningBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nowadays, manufacturers aim at satisfying diverse and changing customer demand in order to survive in the competitive market. An approach that combines several manufacturing concepts, including product platform formation and hybrid manufacturing, is proposed in order to effectively manage the product variety. A genetic algorithm-based model is introduced to design the optimal or near-optimal platform for large sets of products and features that can be further manufactured by additive and/or subtractive manufacturing to be customized into different product variants. An illustrative example is used to demonstrate the model. The proposed model leads to better management of product proliferation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProcedia CIRPSame topicProduct Development and CustomizationFrench-language works237,207