Channel Estimation for Distributed Intelligent Reflecting Surfaces Assisted Multi-User MISO Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intelligent reflecting surfaces (IRSs)-assisted wireless communication promises improved system performance, while posing new challenges in channel estimation (CE) due to the passive nature of the reflecting elements. Although a few CE protocols for IRS-assisted multiple-input single-output (MISO) systems have appeared, they either require long channel training times or are developed under channel sparsity assumptions. Moreover, existing works focus on a single IRS, whereas in practice multiple such surfaces should be installed to truly benefit from the concept of reconfiguring propagation environments. In light of these challenges, this paper tackles the CE problem for the distributed IRSs-assisted multi-user MISO system. An optimal CE protocol requiring relatively low training overhead is developed using Bayesian techniques under the practical assumption that the BS-IRSs channels are dominated by the line-of-sight (LoS) components. An optimal solution for the phase shifts vectors required at all IRSs during CE is determined and the minimum mean square error (MMSE) estimates of the BS-users direct channels and the IRSs-users channels are derived. Simulation results corroborate the normalized MSE (NMSE) analysis and establish the advantage of the proposed protocol as compared to benchmark scheme in terms of training overhead.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".