MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3087796445 · doi:10.21606/drs.2020.106

DRS2020 Editorial: Pluriversal Design SIG

2020· article· sv· W3087796445 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of DRS · 2020
Typearticle
Languagesv
FieldComputer Science
TopicInnovative Human-Technology Interaction
Canadian institutionsOntario College of Art and Design
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUniversalismNature versus nurtureModernityPoint (geometry)AestheticsComputer scienceSociologyEpistemologyHistoryPolitical scienceArtPhilosophyAnthropologyMathematicsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

What is Pluriversal Design? We believe it is a form of design that aims to nurture and highlight multiple ways of world-making and create conditions for multiple worlds to flourish. The concept of the pluriverse challenges one of the pillars of Western Modernity that is universalism—the idea that we all live in a single world—in favor of a multiplicity of possible worlds (Kothari et al. 2019). Since the 16th century, the world’s history has been told from the point of view and voices of people from Europe and, subsequently, English-speaking North-America (Global North).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.639
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it