The complete mitochondrial genome and phylogenetic analysis of sugarcane ( <i>Saccharum</i> spp. hybrids) line 15a-53
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The complete mitogenome of Saccharum spp. hybrid 15a-53 was determined in this study, which contains two distinct circular chromosomes, Chromosome 1 and 2. The length of Chromosome 1 is 300,848 bp with the GC content of 43.93%, while Chromosome 2 is 144,713 bp in length with the GC content of 43.57%. In Chromosome 1, 7.14% of the genome (21,468 nucleotides) is coding DNA and 92.86% (279,380 nucleotides) are intergenic region, while in Chromosome 2, 8.20% of genome (11,865 nucleotides) are coding DNA and 91.80% (132,848 nucleotides) are intergenic region. Chromosome 1 contains 20 protein-coding genes (three atp genes, three ccm genes, two cox genes, one mat gene, one mtt gene, six nad genes, and four rps genes), and 21 non-coding genes (15 tRNA and six rRNAs), while in Chromosome 2, there are 13 protein-coding genes (four nad genes, three rps genes, two atp genes, one ccm gene, one cob gene, one cox gene, and one rpl gene) and five tRNA genes. Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic analysis indicated that 15a-53 is close to S. spp. hybrid ROC22, S. spp. hybrid FN15 and S. officinarum Khon Kaen 3. The complete mitochondrial genome herein will provide useful sequence information for phylogenetic and evolutionary studies for Saccharum and Poaceae.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it