Gouty Stenosing Tenosynovitis: Trigger Finger as a First Presentation of Tophaceous Gout
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gout can lead to the deposition of tophi and chronic arthritis, for which surgical management is indicated when tophi interfere with the function of the finger. This case report discusses the management of a 37-year-old man with a past medical history of gout who presented with triggering of his small finger from gouty infiltration of his flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon. An exploratory procedure that included tenolysis and release of the A1 pulley was performed. Gouty infiltration of the FDP tendon was noted intraoperatively and biopsied, which was later confirmed by histopathological analysis as being gouty tophus. The patient regained full function of the affected finger postoperatively and has since had no recurrence. Gouty tenosynovitis is a rare cause of trigger finger and should be considered as part of the differential diagnosis. Treatment for gouty tenosynovitis consists of A1 pulley release and careful excision of gouty tophus to restore tendon glide and hand function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".