MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3087939374 · doi:10.36834/cmej.71151

Being a post-positivist is exhausting: The daunting commitment to an uncertain truth

2020· editorial· en· W3087939374 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Marcel D’Eon

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Education Journal · 2020
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophy, History, and Historiography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPositivismComputer scienceEpistemologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is exhausting being a post-positivist. We believe that there is truth out there, but we can only know it imperfectly. We are driven to searching, gathering more information, questioning our biases, and trying to take other perspectives. We never actually find peace and cannot rest from our perpetual wondering and second-guessing. Dealing with relentless ambiguity and the pursuit of truth is psychologically draining. We are prisoners of an unending quest: like Ulysses, we hear the irresistible siren voices calling us to believe that we have the truth but have restrained ourselves from falling prey to their ephemeral pleasures. We are forced to eat the unholy gruel of incomplete knowledge and pervasive uncertainty. I'm weary from the struggle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Education JournalSame topicPhilosophy, History, and HistoriographyFrench-language works237,207