MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3087978799

Therapeutic management of Hepatozoon canis induced acute hepatitis in a dog

2018· article· en· W3087978799 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Neeraj Thakur, Chethan Ge, Akhilesh Akhilesh, Aishwarya Lekshman, Priyanka Kumari, Munazah Shehzad, JB Rajesh, Krishantini Mahendran, UK De, PS Banerjee

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Entomology and Zoology Studies · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicVector-borne infectious diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineBlood urea nitrogenCreatinineComplete blood countGastroenterologyHypoalbuminemiaVomitingLeukocytosisVeterinary medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A three year old Labrador retriever dog was presented to the Referral Veterinary Polyclinic, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar with a history of vomiting, anorexia, fever and tick infestation. Clinical examination revealed pyrexia, pale conjunctival and oral mucous membrane, hepatomegaly, peripheral lymphadenopathy. Haemato-biochemical evaluation revealed anemia (Hb- 8.1g/dl, RBC- 3.95 millions/mm3, PCV- 25.2%), leukocytosis (21.32×103 cells/mm3), thrombocytopenia (1.12 lakhs/mm3), Hypoalbuminemia (1.44 g/dl), hyperglobulinemia (4.51 g/dl) and elevated levels of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (37.4 mg/dl), creatinine (2.05 mg/dl), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (162 U/L) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (48 U/L). Blood smear examination revealed Hepatozoon canis gamonts in the neutrophils. The animal was treated with a combination therapy including single dose of Inj. Imidocarb dipropionate (6.6 mg/kg, SC) and Tab. Doxycycline (5 mg/kg, PO, BID) for 28 days. Supportive treatment was done with antiemetics, hepatoprotectants, hematinics, plasma expanders and acaricides. An uneventful recovery was noticed after 28 days of treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.539

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Entomology and Zoology StudiesSame topicVector-borne infectious diseasesFrench-language works237,207