Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet essai étudie l’histoire complexe et l’existence précaire de l’artisanat à domicile, survivant en marge des débats au sujet des expositions et du colonialisme. On y examine le « Donegal Industrial Fund » une organisation fondée en 1883 par Alice Rowland Hart à Londres et les contributions de cette fondation à l’exposition irlandaise de Londres (1888) et à la foire mondiale de Chicago (1895). L’article s’efforce de montrer que le colonialisme est implicitement mêlé à la renaissance de l’artisanat à domicile en Irlande (souvent appelé « home arts ») qui correspond avec l’intensité croissante des débats au sujet du « Home Rule » et des appels à l’indépendance. De plus il réévalue le lien inextricable entre artisanat à domicile et philanthropie au dix-neuvième siècle dans les journaux et les magazines, une relation qui a contribué à une féminisation excessive de l’artisanat à domicile et à une marginalisation des arts ménagers (« home arts ») dans les discussions sur le mouvement d’« Arts and Crafts » (Arts et Métiers) à la fin du dix-neuvième siècle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".