Maternal Prenatal Anxiety, Attachment and Children’s Externalizing and Internalizing Behavioral Problems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Perinatal anxiety is common, and affects up to 15-20% of women during perinatal period (Abrar, Fairbrother, Smith, Skoll, & Albert, 2020). Regarded as a prenatal programming factor (Madigan et al., 2018), prenatal anxiety (PA) is associated with biological, cognitive, and behavioral development in offspring, increasing risk for later externalizing and internalizing problems and adult psychopathology (Finsaas et al., 2018; Vogel, Jackson, Barch, Tillman, & Luby, 2019). Child behavioral development is also influenced by the postpartum anxiety (Madigan et al., 2018; Vogel et al., 2019). Externalizing behaviors are more often observed in boys and internalizing behaviors are more often observed in girls (Martel, 2013). Maternal-child attachment is defined as an affectionate, mutually satisfying relationship between a child and a caregiver that is involved in making the child feel safe, secure, and protected (Bowlby, 1958). Maternal-child attachment may moderate the association between PA and externalizing and internalizing behavioral problems, and function differently for boys and girls. The first manuscript provides a review of women’s experiences with postpartum anxiety, showing that postpartum anxiety is common, and can have serious implications for the maternal-child relationship. The second manuscript consists of a concept analysis of parent-child attachment to advance the application of this concept in nursing practice. The third manuscript presents the results of testing associations between PA and children's behavioral problems, and the role of maternal-child attachment and child sex as moderators of this association. Maternal-child attachment security moderated the association between prenatal anxiety and children’s behavioral problems; however, the sex of the child did not. The final paper describes the sample from which the third paper was derived, the Alberta Pregnancy Outcomes and Nutrition (APrON) cohort, highlighting findings on maternal and paternal mental health from pregnancy to three years postpartum. The dissertation concludes with recommendations for nursing research, policy, education and practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".