MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3088095911 · doi:10.5194/tc-2020-46-rc1

Review of "Dry-air entrainment and advection during alpine blowing snow events” by Nikolas O. Aksamit and John Pomeroy

2020· peer-review· en· W3088095911 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stephen J. Déry

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepeer-review
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEntrainment (biomusicology)AdvectionAtmospheric sciencesEnvironmental scienceAir entrainmentMeteorologyHydrology (agriculture)MechanicsThermodynamicsGeologyPhysicsGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents measurements of high frequency atmospheric conditions during five blowing snow events in the fall/winter of 2015/2016 observed at the Fortress Mountain Snow Laboratory (FMSL) in southwestern Alberta, Canada.The dataset includes 3-D air temperature and wind speed fluctuations from two sonic anemometers and meteorological conditions at three proximal automatic weather stations.Blowing snow conditions are stratified into "sweep" or "ejection" events based on the combination of horizontal and vertical wind speed anomalies.The observations reveal periodic incursions of dry air from aloft that sustain or enhance blowing snow sublimation during wind transport events.Sudden increases of up to 1 • C in air temperatures from dry/warm air entrainment suggests increased available thermal energy for C1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.175

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations→French-language works237,207→