MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3088096465 · doi:10.5539/ass.v16n10p65

Shanghai Gong Shang Magazine and Shanghai Modern Textile Industry

2020· article· en· W3088096465 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Huaming Zhang, Dawei Liao

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Industries and Urban Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Textile industryIdeologyBusinessTextileEconomyCommercePolitical scienceHistoryEconomicsPoliticsLawArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Shanghai Gong Shang is an official journal of Shanghai Federation of industry and commerce. During the period from 1949 to 1951, there were a lot of information about textile industry in Shanghai Gong Shang. The role of Shanghai Gong Shang is not only to help the government to publicize industrial and commercial policies, but also to help the government understand the ideological trends of people in the industrial and commercial circles at that time, and to answer the practical problems of production in the industrial and commercial circles. When major events occur and important policies are implemented, there are a large number of articles on the journals to introduce and interpret the events and policies. Generally speaking, Shanghai Gong Shang is an important information to understand the situation of industry, commerce and textile industry at that time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0710.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Social Science→Same topicCultural Industries and Urban Development→French-language works237,207→