MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3088102635 · doi:10.1149/09810.0171ecst

Real-Time Monitoring for Electrochemical Analysis in Molten LiCl-KCl Eutectic Salt

2020· article· en· W3088102635 on OpenAlexaff
Han Lim, Jun Woo Park, Jong-Il Yun

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicMolten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMolten saltPotentiostatEutectic systemElectrochemistryMolten salt reactorElectrodeMaterials scienceLithium (medication)Analytical Chemistry (journal)Inorganic chemistryChemistryMetallurgyChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the present work, a real-time monitoring system for molten LiCl-KCl eutectic salt medium is set up with optically accessible quartz windows mounted on the furnace and the CMOS camera. Based on the designed system, the real-time monitoring was carried out to investigate the electrode behavior in various electrochemical systems, such as (1) differences in Co morphology deposited in molten CoCl2-LiCl-KCl system by various electrochemical deposition methods, (2) a reoxidation behavior of electrochemically reduced lithium, and (3) a reduction of Zr(IV) ions to Zr(III) ions in the molten ZrCl4-LiCl-KCl system. By delivering the video signal from the CMOS camera to the PC which controls the potentiostat, the visual changes can also be synced with the measured current or potential during the experiment. This enables us to compare the visualized morphological properties on the surface of the working electrode under different applied potential conditions during the application of electroanalytical methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicMolten salt chemistry and electrochemical processesFrench-language works237,207