MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3088141542 · doi:10.1101/2020.09.24.20200964

NeuroPM toolbox: integrating Molecular, Neuroimaging and Clinical data for Characterizing Neuropathological Progression and Individual Therapeutic Needs

2020· preprint· en· W3088141542 on OpenAlexaff
Yasser Iturria‐Medina, Félix Carbonell, Atousa Assadi, Quadri Adewale, Ahmed Faraz Khan, Robert Baumeister, Lazaro M. Sanchez-Rodriguez

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroimagingContext (archaeology)Computer scienceToolboxNeuroscienceWorkstationCognitionMachine learningPsychologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract There is a critical need for a better multiscale and multifactorial understanding of neurological disorders, covering from genes to neuroimaging to clinical factors and treatments effects. Here we present NeuroPM-box , a cross-platform, user-friendly and open-access software for characterizing multiscale and multifactorial brain pathological mechanisms and identifying individual therapeutic needs. The implemented methods have been extensively tested and validated in the neurodegenerative context, but there is not restriction in the kind of disorders that can be analyzed. By using advanced analytic modeling of molecular, neuroimaging and/or cognitive/behavioral data, this framework allows multiple applications, including characterization of: (i) the series of sequential states (e.g. transcriptomic, imaging or clinical alterations) covering decades of disease progression, (ii) intra-brain spreading of pathological factors (e.g. amyloid and tau misfolded proteins), (iii) synergistic interactions between multiple brain biological factors (e.g. direct tau effects on vascular and structural properties), and (iv) biologically-defined patients stratification based on therapeutic needs (i.e. optimum treatments for each patient). All models’ outputs are biologically interpretable. A 4D-viewer allows visualization of spatiotemporal brain (dis)organization. Originally implemented in MATLAB, NeuroPM-box is compiled as standalone application for Windows, Linux and Mac environments: neuropm-lab.com/software . In a “regular” workstation, it can analyze over 150 subjects per day, reducing the need for using clusters or High-Performance Computing (HPC) for large-scale datasets. This open-access tool for academic researchers may significantly contribute to a better understanding of complex brain processes and to accelerating the implementation of Precision Medicine (PM) in neurology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.123

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksFrench-language works237,207