Smart face identification via improved <scp>LBP</scp> and <scp>HOG</scp> features
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Smart face identification is widely used in smart city and smart healthcare. However, smart face identification technology is susceptible to envirnmental factor, such as illumination, mask, and expression. In order to fully extract facial feature information, we fuse an improved local binary pattern (LBP) and the histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) to extract the texture and detailed features on the face. The 2DPCA + PCA is used to reduce the dimensionality of the extracted features. The 2DPCA sloves the issue that the model is too complex when the feature dimension is very high. The feature reduction reduces the calculation scale and increases the calculation speed. Finally, experimental results on ORL and Yale face databases show that the feature extraction based on the fusion of improved LBP and HOG complement with each other. Compared with other recognition algorithms, the improved algorithm has higher recognition and identification rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it