Automatic Detection and Location of Seismic Events From Time‐Delay Projection Mapping and Neural Network Classification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The past several decades have seen an exponential increase in the volume of available seismic data, and with it has come the need to develop fast, automatic earthquake detection, and location algorithms. Some of the most recent and promising tools come from the field of machine learning. In this study, we combine a recent seismic detection and location method with neural network classification and analyze 4 months of continuous data recorded by a network of 76 stations in northern California. While these approaches have been used separately, our implementation is unique in that it is not constrained by source templates and avoids user‐defined detection thresholds. In particular, we partition our data set into 234,240, 3‐min long time windows with 75% overlap. For each time window, we create a 3D image that captures information about the coherence of the seismic wavefield. We then devise four features as input and train a neural network classifier to predict which time windows in the data set are likely to contain regional seismic events. These features include the second and fourth Hu image moments computed from 2D cross sections of our 3D images and statistical p values that quantify the probability of observing network‐wide power‐spectral density values at 0.2 and 0.5 s. Our neural network model predicts that 2,522 time windows contain seismic events, from which we locate 1,192 unique events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".