MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3088355966 · doi:10.3390/s20195541

Simultaneously Low Rank and Group Sparse Decomposition for Rolling Bearing Fault Diagnosis

2020· article· en· W3088355966 on OpenAlexaff
Kai Zheng, Yin Bai, Jingfeng Xiong, Feng Yi Tan, Dewei Yang, Yi Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersChongqing Municipal Education CommissionChongqing Research Program of Basic Research and Frontier TechnologyNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsHankel matrixSingular value decompositionRank (graph theory)Singular valueFault (geology)AlgorithmComputer scienceFeature (linguistics)Bearing (navigation)Pattern recognition (psychology)Matrix (chemical analysis)Matrix decompositionFeature extractionArtificial intelligenceMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Singular value decomposition (SVD) methods have aroused wide concern to extract the periodic impulses for bearing fault diagnosis. The state-of-the-art SVD methods mainly focus on the low rank property of the Hankel matrix for the fault feature, which cannot achieve satisfied performance when the background noise is strong. Different to the existing low rank-based approaches, we proposed a simultaneously low rank and group sparse decomposition (SLRGSD) method for bearing fault diagnosis. The major contribution is that the simultaneously low rank and group sparse (SLRGS) property of the Hankel matrix for fault feature is first revealed to improve performance of the proposed method. Firstly, we exploit the SLRGS property of the Hankel matrix for the fault feature. On this basis, a regularization model is formulated to construct the new diagnostic framework. Furthermore, the incremental proximal algorithm is adopted to achieve a stationary solution. Finally, the effectiveness of the SLRGSD method for enhancing the fault feature are profoundly validated by the numerical analysis, the artificial bearing fault experiment and the wind turbine bearing fault experiment. Simulation and experimental results indicate that the SLRGSD method can obtain superior results of extracting the incipient fault feature in both performance and visual quality as compared with the state-of-the-art methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.916

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensorsSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207