Estimation of the Shape Parameter of a Wear-Out Failure Period for a Three-Parameter Weibull Distribution in a Small Sample
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a method to estimate a shape parameter for a three-parameter Weibull distribution. The proposed method first derives an unbiased estimator for the shape parameter independent of the location and scale parameters and then estimates the shape parameter using a minimum-variance linear unbiased estimator. Since the proposed method is expressed using a hyperparameter, its optimal hyperparameter is searched using Monte Carlo simulations. The recommended hyperparameter used for estimating the shape parameter depends on the sample size, and this causes no problems since the sample size is known when data is obtained. The proposed method is evaluated using a bias and a root mean squared error, and the results are very promising when the population shape parameter is 2 or more in the Weibull distribution representing the wear-out failure period. A numerical dataset is analyzed to demonstrate the practical use of the proposed method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it