MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3088368921

First report of a new invasive pest fall army worm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) in maize crop at Pantnagar, Uttarakhand

2019· article· en· W3088368921 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
RP Maurya, Latika Brijwal, Parul Suyal, Himanshu Patwal, M. B. Deepak Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Entomology and Zoology Studies · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPEST analysisSpodopteraVeterinary medicineFall armywormBiologyCropGenBankForensic scienceEntomologyBiotechnologyAgronomyBotanyMedicineGeneGenetics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) is a noxious lepidopterous pest of maize crop. Northern region of India was devoid from incidences of S. frugiperda until now in 2019 it has been observed in Uttarakhand state for the first time at N.E.B. Corp Research Center, GBPUA&T Pantnagar, Udham Singh Nagar during the routine survey in the maize field. The morphological and molecular tools were used for the identification of the Pantnagar pest sample. The mtCOI gene was used as molecular marker and it was found that the Pantnagar sample sequence showed 100% similarity after BLAST with the sequence accession No. GU095403.1 (658 bp) and MH704433 (658bp) of S. frugiperda from Canada and Karnataka (India), respectively. The mtCOI consensus sequences generated for Pantnagar sample of 630 bp has been deposited in National Centre for Biotechnology Information GenBank databases as S. frugiperda sequence of Pantnagar sample. Morphological and molecular characterization of Pantnagar pest sample marked the conformity of the pest being S. frugiperda (J.E. Smith) which is reported for the first time from Uttarakhand state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.637

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Entomology and Zoology StudiesSame topicInsect Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207