MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3088422120 · doi:10.7202/1069595ar

Body Politics and the Art of Norval Morrisseau

2020· article· fr· W3088422120 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Carmen Robertson

Bibliographic record

VenueRACAR Revue d art canadienne · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersUniversity of Regina
KeywordsHumanitiesArtEthnologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’artiste Anishnaabe Norval Morrisseau utilise un langage visuel unique pour construire symboliquement des corps, alliant expressions formelles et culturelles dans plusieurs de ses oeuvres. Le présent texte explore l’engagement de Morrisseau envers la colonisation, telle qu’elle s’inscrit sur le corps. Ses figures incarnent le message politique de Morrisseau, alors qu’il exploite adroitement forme et médium pour aborder, de manière critique, la politique du corps autochtone. Les corps expriment en termes visuels les points de vue divergents créés par la colonisation de même que l’ambiguïté de l’hybridité culturelle. Dans un style autochtone qui montre les mécanismes intérieurs du corps, Morrisseau commente l’histoire troublante de la colonisation canadienne, l’héritage de la variole et les relations entre les Autochtones et le courant dominant, tout en renvoyant aux traditions artistiques anishnaabe. Ainsi, pour Morrisseau, le corps devient un site politique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score0.900

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0180.047
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRACAR Revue d art canadienneSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207