Thiacrown Ethers Engaged C<sub>60</sub> through Charge Transfer: Experimental and Theoretical Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract UV–Vis spectroscopy is used to study the charge transfer complexes of thiacrown ethers 1–6 with fullerene. The size of TCE1-6 and the nature of the heteroatoms (N, O and S) have been systematically changed to examine the effect of these factors on the HOMO/LUMO energy levels, the optical energy gap and the interactions between TCE’s and C60. The negative and positive values of ΔS designate the structural forming method and the randomness of the free solvent molecules, respectively. Thermodynamics and stability data show that the complexes have a 1:1 ratio that has been emphasized by density functional theory calculations. Additionally, they show a synergetic interplay of donor–acceptor, π–π, and n–π interactions, which are the basis for the affinity of our novel receptors toward C60. The proposed system of enzyme model suggests a development concept in the future design of enzyme model organic photovoltaic systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".