MétaCan
← all works

Animal models for COVID-19

2020· review· en· 875 citations· W3088521725 on OpenAlex· 10.1038/s41586-020-2787-6

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.

Machine scores (provisional)

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.472
Teacher spread
0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Abstract

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database — OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

The record

Venue
Nature
Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Field
Medicine
Canadian institutions
University of Saskatchewan
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institutes of HealthWorld Health Organization
Keywords
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PandemicSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Coronavirus2019-20 coronavirus outbreakMedicineVirologyImmunityPneumoniaIntensive care medicineBetacoronavirusSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirusImmunologyDiseaseOutbreakInfectious disease (medical specialty)Immune systemPathology
Has abstract in OpenAlex
no