MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3088527583 · doi:10.3390/sym12091575

Adaptive Mechanism Model for the Prevention of SLA Violation in the Context of COPD Patient Monitoring

2020· article· en· W3088527583 on OpenAlexafffund
Konan-Marcelin Kouamé, Hamid Mcheick, Hicham Ajami

Bibliographic record

VenueSymmetry · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicService-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
KeywordsComputer scienceContext (archaeology)Service-level agreementQuality of serviceControl (management)Service (business)Data qualityQuality (philosophy)Computer networkArtificial intelligenceBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we introduce a new kind of Service Level Agreement(SLA) Template to better control dynamically quality of medical monitoring platform service. Our approach is based on Health care system and Health Information Technology (HIT) research area, specifically the field of telemonitoring system for patients who suffer from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). According to WHO statistics, COPD is the third leading cause of death worldwide. To this end, several solutions or platforms exist today to monitor COPD. Most of these platforms manage large volume of patient data. This can bring about quality and lost data problems. To address these issues, control mechanisms must be proposed and designed to improve the quality of service (QoS) on these platforms. A platform with continuously monitored QoS can save patients’ lives and reduce data quality risk. In this article, we propose an ontology that uses SLAs data from COPD monitoring platforms with dynamic data from a patient context. We dynamically calculate the number of patient data incidents and the number of service request incidents from two dynamic contexts: SLA and the patient context. If the number of incidents is higher than what is expected in the SLA, then alerts are sent to the interface parties in real time. Finally, the contribution of this article is the proposed virtual SLA template to better control SLA violation and improve quality of medical monitoring platforms services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.171

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSymmetrySame topicService-Oriented Architecture and Web ServicesFrench-language works237,207