MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3088608286 · doi:10.1080/00288306.2020.1823433

Shallow seismic reflection imaging of the Alpine Fault through late Quaternary sedimentary units at Whataroa, New Zealand

2020· article· en· W3088608286 on OpenAlexaff
Aleasha King, Patrick Rafe Wadworth Lepine, Andrew R. Gorman, David J. Prior, Adrienn Lukács, Malcolm J. Bowman, Sheng Fan, Andrew Robertson, Franz Lutz, J. D. Eccles, Stefan Buske, Vera Lay, Douglas R. Schmitt, Heather Schijns

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersMarsden FundUniversity of Otago
KeywordsGeologyQuaternaryReflection (computer programming)SeismologySedimentary rockFault (geology)Geophysical imagingPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The glacio‐fluvial sediments of the Whataroa Valley on the west coast of New Zealand's South Island contain a record of environmental change since the Last Glacial Maximum. The valley is cut by the Australia–Pacific plate‐bounding Alpine Fault, the position of which is obscured by recent glacio‐fluvial outwash deposits. Five seismic profiles collected across the inferred surface trace of the Alpine Fault between 2011 and 2018, using a variety of source types, are presented here; these profiles provide constraints on the fault's location in the upper few hundred metres of the near surface. The sedimentary strata in the Whataroa Valley have been classified into seismic facies based on their reflectivity characteristics. Two reflective seismic facies, recognisable in all profiles, have been interpreted to correspond to recent fluvial outwash gravels (seismic facies 1) and older post‐glacial glaciofluvial or marine sediments (seismic facies 2). These reflective packages are cut by Alpine Fault rupture surfaces with reverse motion dips of 60° to 80° and total throw of up to 50 m. Faults imaged in three of the profiles are interpreted to correspond to the most recent surface rupture of the Alpine Fault, due to their close proximity to a recently trenched surface scarp.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.300
Threshold uncertainty score0.596

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew Zealand Journal of Geology and GeophysicsSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207