MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3088610630

The introduction of a unit council changes Nursing and Midwifery practice in the Neonatal and Obstetrics unit of the first private public partnership Hospital in Poland

2020· article· en· W3088610630 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kelly Beckta

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma and Emergency Care Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipNursingUnit (ring theory)MedicineBest practiceHealth careObstetricsPolitical sciencePsychologyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kelly Beckta is Director of Nursing for InterHealth Canada the private partner engaged in The Zywiec Hospital Public Private Partnership (PPP), it is the first integrated healthcare PPP in Poland. The Existing Hospital is the only hospital in the area and suffers from poor infrastructure with equipment that is either obsolete or is reaching the end of its lifespan. Interhealth Canada is providing a brandnew hospital designed in compliance with global standards and furnished with all new equipment. The moving of 280 patients and 600 staff to the new hospital will begin in April 2020. This unique healthcare project includes an enormous piece of change management, best practice being the most important. Healthcare change is challenging at The Zywiec Hospital where the average age of nurses is 53 and many have worked at the current hospital for over thirty years. Kelly Beckta’s gap analysis of the neonatal and obstetrical unit revealed that best practice was not currently in place despite Polish regulations being passed over a year ago regarding the Mother Baby model of care. The midwives have been caring for only the mothers and the nurses only for the newborn for over thirty years, the previous leadership was unsuccessful at implementing the new regulatory or best practice changes. Kelly Beckta formed the Zywiec Hospital Obstetrics and Neonatal Unit council which includes herself, nurses, midwives, and the neonatal and obstetrics head nurses. They are collaborating together to exceed patients’ expectations, implement best practice, and facilitate better patient outcomes by engaging nursing/midwives in decision making. The council utilizes evidenced based practice guidelines, research, and policy and procedures to identify opportunities for improvements that enhance patient care and clinical outcomes. Despite thirty years of practicing the same way, they are successfully making the new changes together as a team.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTrauma and Emergency Care Studies→French-language works237,207→