MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3088642313 · doi:10.1164/rccm.202006-2359oc

Aprepitant for Cough in Lung Cancer. A Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial and Mechanistic Insights

2020· article· en· W3088642313 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory and Cough-Related Research
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences Centre
FundersManchester Biomedical Research CentreMedical Research CouncilNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchCancer Research UKWellcome Trust
KeywordsAprepitantNauseaLung cancerPlaceboVagus nerveSubstance PClinical endpointCrossover study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rationale Effective cough treatments are a significant unmet need in patients with lung cancer. Aprepitant is a licensed treatment for nausea and vomiting, which blocks substance P activation of NK-1 (neurokinin 1) receptors, a mechanism also implicated in cough. Objectives To assess aprepitant in patients with lung cancer with cough and evaluate mechanisms in vagal nerve tissue. Methods Randomized double-blind crossover trial of patients with lung cancer and bothersome cough. They received 3 days of aprepitant or matched placebo; after a 3-day washout, patients crossed to the alternative treatment. The primary endpoint was awake cough frequency measured at screening and Day 3 of each treatment; secondary endpoints included patient-reported outcomes. In vitro, the depolarization of isolated guinea pig and human vagus nerve sections in grease-gap recording chambers, indicative of sensory nerve activation, was measured to evaluate the mechanism. Measurements and Main Results Twenty patients with lung cancer enrolled, with a mean age 66 years (±7.7); 60% were female and 80% had non–small cell cancer, 50% had advanced stage, and 55% had World Health Organization performance status 1. Cough frequency improved with aprepitant, reducing by 22.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8–37.7%) over placebo while awake (P = 0.03), 30.3% (95% CI, 12.7–44.3) over 24 hours (P = 0.002), and 59.8% (95% CI, 15.1–86.0) during sleep (P = 0.081). Patient-reported outcomes all significantly improved. Substance P depolarized both guinea pig and human vagus nerve. Aprepitant significantly inhibited substance P–induced depolarization by 78% in guinea pig (P = 0.0145) and 94% in human vagus (P = 0.0145). Conclusions Substance P activation of NK-1 receptors appears to be an important mechanism driving cough in lung cancer, and NK-1 antagonists show promise as antitussive therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it