MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3088769435 · doi:10.32497/akunbisnis.v1i2.1234

Perhitungan Alokasi Dana Bagi Hasil Pajak Rokok Pada Badan Pengelola Pendapatan Daerah Provinsi Jawa Tengah Triwulan Iv Tahun 2016

2018· article· en· W3088769435 on OpenAlex
Akhsanur Rifai, Resi Yudhaningsih

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Aktual Akuntansi Keuangan Bisnis Terapan (AKUNBISNIS) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Growth and Fiscal Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)RevenuePopulationJavaBusinessTax revenueFinanceEconomicsGeographyMedicineEnvironmental healthPublic economicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reseach aims to know determine the procedure for calculating the allocation of funds from cigarette tax revenues quarter IV to Regency / City of Central Java Province On Central Java Regional Income Management Board. Writing method used are the method of description and exposition. The calculation of the allocation of revenue sharing funds for tobacco tax quarter IV which is in use is the realization of 2016. The results of the calculating the allocation of funds from cigarette tax revenues quarter IV to Regency / City between of Central Java Province On Central Java Regional Income Management with regulation governer 67 in 2014 Show result different. Different because that the share of cigarette tax data the number of population used is the data of population in 2014, when it should be calculated with the data of the population in 2015.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.476
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it