MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3088864553 · doi:10.30736/je.v5i2.513

Pemanfaatan Quantum GIS Cloud Untuk Pemetaan Polygon Area Kandang Peternakan di Wilayah Kabupaten Probolinggo

2020· article· en· W3088864553 on OpenAlexaff
Moch Nur Qomaruddin, Amalia - Herlina, Sulistiyanto Sulistiyanto

Bibliographic record

VenueJE-UNISLA · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMultimedia Learning Systems
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLivestockAnimal husbandryAgricultural scienceGeographyGeographic information systemBusinessCartographyForestryAgricultureEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Department of Husbandry and Animal Health (Disnakkeswan) Probolinggo, is a government agency that has data on livestock, one of which is the location mapping data for the stables. This data is needed by Disnakkeswan and the general public to find information on the location of the livestock sheds in the Probolinggo district. Currently, the data on the location of the cage which is owned by the agency is still in the form of excel table data. This creates difficulties for the Animal Husbandry and Animal Health Service (Disnakkeswan) and the general public when looking for information on the location of the livestock pen. Among other things, the difficulty made them have to waste time finding the location of the farm stables. Given the roles and responsibilities of the Department of Animal Husbandry and Animal Health (Disnakkeswan) Probolinggo Regency above, an application is needed that will support or facilitate this task. The information presented in the Geographical Information System mapping the location of livestock stalls is the location of the co-ordinates for beef cattle, dairy and ducks. which can provide information about the location (stables) of the farm in the form of a map using a geographic information system with QGis Cloud.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJE-UNISLASame topicMultimedia Learning SystemsFrench-language works237,207