Bibliographic record
Abstract
Book Review| July 01, 2020 Mont Saint-Hilaire: History, Geology, Mineralogy Mont Saint-Hilaire: History, Geology, Mineralogy. By László Horváth, Robert A. Gault, Elsa Pfenninger-Horváth and Glenn Poirier. The Canadian Mineralogist, Special Publication 14, 2019. IX + 634 pages. ISBN 978-0-921294-61-0. Alf Olav Larsen Alf Olav Larsen Stathelle, Norway Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar The Canadian Mineralogist (2020) 58 (4): 543–545. https://doi.org/10.3749/canmin.BR00005 Article history first online: 25 Sep 2020 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Alf Olav Larsen; Mont Saint-Hilaire: History, Geology, Mineralogy. The Canadian Mineralogist 2020;; 58 (4): 543–545. doi: https://doi.org/10.3749/canmin.BR00005 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentBy SocietyThe Canadian Mineralogist Search Advanced Search The authors are the couple László and Elsa Horváth, who have spent the last 20 years working on this monograph, along with the mineralogist Robert Gault and geologist Glenn Poirier. Interestingly, both the Horváths as well as Gault are autodidacts in mineralogy and have gained deep knowledge in this field. The now retired Robert Gault worked as a research assistent at the Canadian Museum of Nature in Ottawa and has since 1991 been operator of the institution's electron microprobe. This allowed him to investigate the chemical composition of MSH minerals firsthand. Glenn Poirier works as a senior research assistant and... You do not currently have access to this article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.206 | 0.089 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".