MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3088907813 · doi:10.5430/rwe.v11n6p119

Public Policy of Green Practices by Restaurants and Hotels: Case of Ecotourism in Ranong Province, Thailand

2020· article· en· W3088907813 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Witthaya Mekhum, Nutsinee Songchan, Sunisa Pensap

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch in World Economy · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEnvironmental Sustainability in Business
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPromotion (chess)BusinessProduct (mathematics)Green innovationMarketingEnvironmentally friendlyEcotourismQuestionnaireTourismEnvironmental economicsGeographyIndustrial organizationEconomicsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study is to highlight the public policy of green practices for hotels and restaurants in Ranong city of Thailand. Along with the public policy of green practices, this study also discussed the green product promotion and green innovation. A questionnaire was used for data collection. Total 420 valid responses were used for data analysis. Results of the study shows the public policy green practices such as environment friendly products, adjustable temperature control in restaurants and hotels, electrical vehicle charging stations and waste management has positive effect on environmental safety. These practices increase the environmental safety in Ranong city of Thailand. Moreover, environment friendly products, adjustable temperature control in restaurants and hotels, electrical vehicle charging stations and waste management has positive role to enhance green product promotion and green innovation. Increase in the green practices increases the green product promotion and green innovation. Finally, green product promotion and green innovation shows positive influence to enhance environmental safety.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.341
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch in World EconomySame topicEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessFrench-language works237,207