MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3088913603 · doi:10.3390/met10101277

Numerical Modeling of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Emissions during Preheating of Magnesia-Carbon Bricks in a Basic Oxygen Furnace

2020· article· en· W3088913603 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Soumitra Kumar Dinda, Kinnor Chattopadhyay

Bibliographic record

VenueMetals · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCombustorNOxBasic oxygen steelmakingWork (physics)OxygenEnvironmental scienceCarbon fibersChemical compositionLimiting oxygen concentrationProcess engineeringHeat transferThermalWaste managementChemistryMaterials scienceSteelmakingMetallurgyThermodynamicsCombustionMechanical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The refractory preheating process in oxygen furnaces is a dynamic input of energy in a chemically complex system requiring special attention to chemical emissions relative to permissible release limits. This particular industrial and regulatory interest is the emission of volatile organic compounds (VOC), given their detrimental impacts on human health. In the present work, a mathematical model was developed to predict the emission rates of volatile organics during the preheating of a 260-ton basic oxygen furnace. A numerical heat transfer model was developed using finite difference techniques to obtain the thermal profile and then integrated with chemical thermodynamics using FactSage 7.0 (CRCT, Polytechnique Montreal Quebec Canada, H3C 3A7). The parameters that affected VOC emissions were preheating process times, burner gas composition, heating rate, and burner geometry. Two different preheating procedures were compared, and emission rates were predicted with extended use of a top burner providing the greatest degree of emissions control. The mathematical model was validated against plant data with respect to average emission rates of CO, CO2, SOX, and NOX.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.321
Threshold uncertainty score0.633

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMetalsSame topicMetallurgical Processes and ThermodynamicsFrench-language works237,207