MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3088961364 · doi:10.26480/bda.01.2020.17.19

ESTIMATION OF HIGH-RESOLUTION RAINFALL USING MICROWAVE LINKS DATA OF CELLULAR SYSTEM

2020· article· en· W3088961364 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Mohsin Waqas, Muhammad Awais, Syed Hamid Hussain Shah

Bibliographic record

VenueBig Data In Agriculture · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPrecipitation Measurement and Analysis
Canadian institutionsAthabasca University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrowaveComputer scienceRemote sensingHigh resolutionResolution (logic)EstimationData miningArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsGeologySystems engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One cannot manage what one does not measure is an old adage that is valid for the rainfall in the irrigated irrigation system. Water resources management required the efficient measurement of all water resources management component. Water resources management components measurement is the responsibility of respective organization. Rainfall measurement is the responsibility of the Pakistan Meteorological Department using standard gauge system. Deficiency in the system is the low spatial and temporal resolution. This directed the water manager towards the high resolution of satellite system. Satellite resolution is still course than the available cellular towers system and it is unable to capture the high resolution spatio-temporal variation in the Rainfall. This challenge of high resolution was conquered using microwave signals of Telenor cellular communication system in the surrounded area of Water Management Research Centre, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad. Rainfall was estimated based on the attenuation in the microwave signal between receiver and transmitter of the link. Receiver and transmitter are two different antenna on the cellular tower. One receiver and one transmitter make the single link. High resolution data at 15-minute temporal and 1.5Km spatial of total 24 links was processed using the R language written code. Results presented that the average daily rainfall using cellular system was 14.5 mm, while the satellite derived rainfall from Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) was found zero and UAF meteorological showed 21.3 mm. Further the temporal resolution was found finer from cellular system that rainfall was occurred at 22:15 to 22:45. The spatial variation in the rainfall between links was found with the minimum of less than 1mm and maximum of 42.9 mm. This state-of-the-art techniques helps the hydrologist for comprehensive analysis and management of the water resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.550
Threshold uncertainty score0.353

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.124
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.119 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBig Data In AgricultureSame topicPrecipitation Measurement and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207