MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3089002199 · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2845

The distance from the Sun to the centre and the shape of the old bulge in the Galaxy: 16 221 OGLE RR Lyrae stars

2020· article· en· W3089002199 on OpenAlexaff
Evgeny Griv, M. Gedalin, P. Pietrukowicz, D. Majaess, Ing‐Guey Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's University
FundersMinistry of Science and Technology, TaiwanIsrael Science FoundationUnited States-Israel Binational Science Foundation
KeywordsBulgePhysicsAstrophysicsRR Lyrae variableRed clumpAstronomyGalaxyStarsGlobular cluster

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT A statistical method is used to determine both the Sun’s distance r0 from the Galactic Centre and the 3D structure of the old stellar population of the Galactic bulge. The space distribution of 16 221 high latitude type-RRab RR Lyrae stars from the optical OGLE survey located towards the bulge is explored. An estimate by using RR Lyraes leads to a mean r0 = 8.28 ± 0.14 kpc within the effective bulge radius of rbulge = 2–3 kpc. The distribution of RR Lyraes within rbulge has the shape of an ellipsoid slightly elongated almost towards the Sun with a major axis of its symmetry a and two minor axes b and c of about the same length. The axial ratio is a: b: c ≈ 1: 0.7: 0.7. These age-old, metal-poor, and kinematically hot stars do not trace a strong bar-like structure in the direction of the bulge at distances >1 kpc from the Galactic Centre, as b/a ∼ 1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→