De Genève à San José: les normes de l'OIT et le système interaméricain de protection des droits humains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Les auteurs démontrent comment les instances interaméricaines de protection des droits humains ont utilisé les normes de l'OIT. Après avoir posé les limites de cet usage, ils l'illustrent par des exemples relatifs au droit à la liberté d'association et aux droits des peuples autochtones. Ils analysent aussi comment ces normes ont influencé la jurisprudence interaméricaine récente relativement à certains droits économiques, sociaux et culturels. Ils affirment que cette méthode de référencement croisé est souhaitable et utile: elle permet aux instances interaméricaines de fonder leur argumentaire sur l'interprétation d'autorités spécialisées, tout en renforçant la crédibilité et la légitimité normative de leurs décisions, qui gagnent en universalité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".